![]() ![]() The major drawback is that one will need AVCHD 2.0/3D capable BD-Players - what are the players from both Panasonic and Sony from the last one or one and a half year. The third possibility would be to use AVCHD 2.0/3D - and NLEs like Edius but also Pinnacle Studio can generate multistream formats, so we need no conversion and can use 1080 50i/60i without an issue. The only limitation I see here is the reduced movement resolution - due to 24 fps compared with 50 or 60 fps with 1080 50i/60i. And we can use it without format conversion for 3D-BDs. Mainly for two reasons - we use a progressive format here what delivers much better quality compared with the "outdated" interlaced formats. It is much better if one can use 1080 24p. ![]() And every format conversion will reduce quality. If they would have included that in the standard (and there is NO technical reason why that would have been impossible), we would be in a much better position - because then we could generate our ISOs or 3D-BDs without a format conversion that reduces quality. If one uses the MVC-based 3D-BDs, the most important limitation is that the wonderfull Blu-ray consortia did not include 1080 50i/60i in the 3D-BD-standard. Sure, there are some possibilities, but at the end of the day most of them seems to have some limitations. With the upcoming MVC-cameras like the TD10 but also the Z10K we spend a lot of time to explore the different ways how to generate outputs, how to distribute them and how to present them. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |